In the college-admissions wars, we parents are the true fighters． We're pushing our kids to get good grades, take SAT preparatory courses and build resumes so they can get into the college of our first choice． I've twice been to the wars, and as I survey the battlefield, something different is happening． We see our kids' college background as a prize demonstrating how well we've raised them． But we can't acknowledge that our obsession is more about us than them． So we've contrivedvarious justifications that turn out to be half-truths, prejudices or myths． It actually doesn't matter much whether Aaron and Nicole go to Stanford．We have a full-blown prestige panic; we worry that there won't be enough prizes to go around． Fearful parents urge their children to apply to more schools than ever． Underlying the hysteria is the belief that scarce elite degrees must be highly valuable． Their graduates must enjoy more success because they get a better education and develop better contacts． All that is plausible--and mostly wrong． We haven't found any convincing evidence that selectivity or prestige matters． Selective schools don't systematically employ better instructional approaches than less selective schools． On two measures--professor's feedback and the number of essay exams--selective schools do slightly worse．By some studies, selective schools do enhance their graduates' lifetime earnings． The gain is reckoned at 2-4% for every 100-point increase in a school's average SAT scores． But even this advantage is probably a statistical fluke． A well-known study examined students who got into highly selective schools and then went elsewhere． They earned just as such as graduates from higher-status schools．Kids count more than their colleges． Getting into Yale may signify intelligence, talent and ambition． But it's not the only indicator and, paradoxically, its significance is declining． The reason:so many similar people go elsewhere． Getting into college isn't life's only competition． In the next competition--the job market and graduate school--the results may change． Old-boy networks are breaking down． Princeton economist Alan Krueger studied admissions to one top Ph．D． program． High scores on the GRE helped explain who got in; degrees of prestigious universities didn' t．So, parents, lighten up． The stakes have been vastly exaggerated． Up to a point, we can rationalize our pushiness． America is a competitive society; our kids need to adjust to that． But too much pushiness can be destructive． The very ambition we impose on our children may get some into Harvard but may also set them up for disappointment． One study found that, other things being equal, graduates of highly selective schools experienced more job dissatisfaction． They may have been so conditioned to being on top that anything less disappoints．Why do parents urge their children to apply to more schools than ever?
A.They want to increase their children's chances of entering a prestigious college．B.They hope their children can enter a university that offers attractive scholarships．C.Their children will have a wider choice of which college to go to．D.Elite universities now enroll fewer students than they used to．

根据提供的信息和语言素材设计教学方案。用英文作答。?33．设计任务：请阅读下面学生信息和语言素材，设计一节英语听说课的教学方案。教案没有固定格式，但须包含下列要点：?·teaching objectives· teaching contents· key and difficult points· major steps and time allocation· activities and justifications教学时间：45分钟?学生概况：某城镇普通中学八年级(初中二年级)学生，班级人数40人，多数已经达到《义务教育英语课程标准(2011版)》四级水平，学生课堂参与积极性一般。?语言素材：?

In the college-admissions wars, we parents are the true fighters． We're pushing our kids to get good grades, take SAT preparatory courses and build resumes so they can get into the college of our first choice． I've twice been to the wars, and as I survey the battlefield, something different is happening． We see our kids' college background as a prize demonstrating how well we've raised them． But we can't acknowledge that our obsession is more about us than them． So we've contrivedvarious justifications that turn out to be half-truths, prejudices or myths． It actually doesn't matter much whether Aaron and Nicole go to Stanford．We have a full-blown prestige panic; we worry that there won't be enough prizes to go around． Fearful parents urge their children to apply to more schools than ever． Underlying the hysteria is the belief that scarce elite degrees must be highly valuable． Their graduates must enjoy more success because they get a better education and develop better contacts． All that is plausible--and mostly wrong． We haven't found any convincing evidence that selectivity or prestige matters． Selective schools don't systematically employ better instructional approaches than less selective schools． On two measures--professor's feedback and the number of essay exams--selective schools do slightly worse．By some studies, selective schools do enhance their graduates' lifetime earnings． The gain is reckoned at 2-4% for every 100-point increase in a school's average SAT scores． But even this advantage is probably a statistical fluke． A well-known study examined students who got into highly selective schools and then went elsewhere． They earned just as such as graduates from higher-status schools．Kids count more than their colleges． Getting into Yale may signify intelligence, talent and ambition． But it's not the only indicator and, paradoxically, its significance is declining． The reason:so many similar people go elsewhere． Getting into college isn't life's only competition． In the next competition--the job market and graduate school--the results may change． Old-boy networks are breaking down． Princeton economist Alan Krueger studied admissions to one top Ph．D． program． High scores on the GRE helped explain who got in; degrees of prestigious universities didn' t．So, parents, lighten up． The stakes have been vastly exaggerated． Up to a point, we can rationalize our pushiness． America is a competitive society; our kids need to adjust to that． But too much pushiness can be destructive． The very ambition we impose on our children may get some into Harvard but may also set them up for disappointment． One study found that, other things being equal, graduates of highly selective schools experienced more job dissatisfaction． They may have been so conditioned to being on top that anything less disappoints．Why does the author say that parents are the true fighters in the college-admissions wars?
A.They have the final say in which university their children are to attend．B.They know best which universities are most suitable for their children．C.They have to carry out intensive surveys of colleges before children make an application．D.They care more about which college their children go to than the children themselves．

Which one is the school's mission and characteristic of the course?
A.Local course．B.School-based curriculum．C.National curriculum．D.Subject curriculum．

根据题目要求完成下列任务，用中文作答。根据以下所给语言素材和教学目标，完成下面问题。【语言素材】A: What would you like for lunch?B: I'd like some green beans, please.A : Sure.B : Thank you.A: What would you like for lunch?C: I'd like some eggplant, please.A: Sorry, no eggplant.Knowledge objectives: Students could ask someone and express own love for food, such as"What would you like?I'd like ... I like ..."Ability objectives: Train students'speaking ability through dialogue practice.Emotional objectives: Develop students'good eating habits.(1)分析明确教学目标的作用。(10分)(2)案例中的课时教学目标存在什么问题?请简要分析。(10分)(3)根据以上问题，修改该教学目标。(10分)

根据题目要求完成下列任务，用中文作答。教师课堂中纠错的意义及策略有哪些?

付款人在进行付款时无（）

A.形式审查义务

B.实质审查义务

C.附带审查义务

D.票据外有关事项的审查义务

根据《公司法》的规定,有限责任公司下列人员中,可以提议召开股东会临时会议的是()。
A.总经理B.人数过半数的股东C.监事会主席D.人数为半数的董事

关于股份有限公司中的监事会，下列说法错误的是()

A.监事会负责提议聘请或更换外部审计机构B.监事会主席和副主席由全体监事过半数选举产生C.监事会中的职工代表的比例不得低于三分之一D.监事会应至少每6个月召开一次会议

三北精神的科学内涵

阿里巴巴提供了“企业名称认证”“企业身份认证”不同种类的认证,可以根据自身的